@walterolson

Why Conservatives shouldn't fear #RankedChoiceVoting (RCV) by @walterolson of @CatoInstitute https://t.co/8UgjkxY0Ib

'#RankedChoiceVoting improves elections by letting voters communicate much richer data about their preferences.' - @walterolson, senior fellow at the @CatoInstitute https://t.co/ueHupdeUvz

@walterolson of @CatoInstitute wrote this response to that Wall St. Journal Op-Ed https://wsj.com/articles/ranked-choice-voting-rcv-electoral-reform-a0f53e5f If Arizonans want to learn more about what #RankedChoiceVoting (RCV) is really about they can check out our linktree.

Thank you to @CatoInstitute ’s @WalterOlson for correcting @WSJ ’s editorial: "#RankedChoiceVoting is based on the insights of economics, and it is neutral as between left and right." https://www.wsj.com/articles/ranked-choice-voting-rcv-electoral-reform-a0f53e5f?reflink=share_mobilewebshare

"If you think Western civ was reactionary & oppressive, wait until you get a load of the world that comes after it" https://t.co/sULrgjmBge

8-year-old had obeyed all traffic laws and told officer "he had learned to drive by watching YouTube videos." https://t.co/1DvCDJBBft

ADA abuse? @walterolson's quick look at “drive-by lawsuits" & “Google lawsuits” http://shout.lt/bMR9T

This law will probably fall to the 1st Amendment challenge, but there are serious 1st Am theorists who think that's a bridge too far https://twitter.com/walterolson/status/804496074392141824

In a moment of glory for Constitution nerds, "Emoluments Clause" is trending on Twitter.

"When Civic Participation Means Shaming A Non-Voter’s Kid" [my @CatoInstitute on that awful video] http://www.cato.org/blog/shaming-non-voters-kids #Cato2016